Having competed in dozens of triathlons over the years, my warm-up is
part of the racing ritual, assuring me that I will be loose and fast
for the coming race. My personal routine is typical of most racers;
light 5-10 minute jog with some short sprints, short pedal on the bike
in a low gear to wake the legs up, and once in the water another 5-10
minute mixed-pace paddle. I was always convinced, as are hundreds of
coaches and training resources, that the warm-up is as important as any
part of the race, and that doing nothing pre-race would be a crime. Then
came a new research study by Martyn J. Binnie, et al, out of the
Western Australian Institute of Sport examining the effect of different
warm-up procedures on subsequent swim and overall sprint distance
triathlon performance.
The effect of warm-up on athletic performance is not a new area of
research. There have been many studies showing the benefits of a
task-specific warm-up, but most for acute bouts of exercise. This study
is somewhat unique in that is looks at the effects of warm-up over the
course of an endurance event where sub-maximal exercise is performed
over a long period. The researchers hypothesized that an active warm-up
would be more beneficial than no warm-up at all, and that warm-up
specificity, in the form of intensity-specific bursts of swimming, may
lead to an enhanced performance in the swim.
The research subjects consisted of 7 in-season competitive
triathletes with an average age of 21 years, who had not competed in 2
weeks and were rested 24 hours before each trial. Every effort was made
to mimic pre-race conditions including time of race, nutrition, sleep,
etc. The testing trials took place in a university setting with the swim
in a 25m pool, bike on a cycle ergometer, and run on a treadmill. The
protocol required each participant to complete one swim time trial of
750 meters, and three simulated sprint distance triathlons of 750m swim,
500kJ bike, and a 5K run. The warm-up protocol consisted of no warm-up
(control group), swim only warm-up, and run-swim warm-up. These were all
fairly short in duration to avoid inducing muscle fatigue.
The results of the trials were somewhat surprising to me, and showed
that there was no significant difference in performance across the
different warm-up protocols, with no warm-up being just as good as the
swim only, and combined run-swim warm-up. Great, now I don’t have to
get to the race site so early and can just hang out chatting with my
friends before the race starts. Not so fast. While this experiment was
interesting and quite novel, the conditions were highly controlled and
did not include all the elements of true competition - fear, anxiety,
pre-race adrenaline, etc. - so let’s not throw the baby out with the
bath water just yet. There is very well a benefit to warm-up - the
researchers in this study acknowledged this - that goes beyond physical
preparedness. It has been well established that a task specific warm-up
can prepare us mentally for the coming event, and for something like the
swim leg of a triathlon - a source of fear for many competitors - can
help to relax the athlete and give them confidence that they are
prepared to execute the task at hand.
Although the results of this research may seem like a blow for the
warm-up, I like to find the good in it. It was demonstrated that there
was no difference in the warm-up, positive or negative, so I say just
stick with what is working for you - what makes you feel the most
relaxed and mentally prepared for the coming race.
No comments:
Post a Comment